Show ratings & reviews for

3.3 Overall Rating

Effectiveness

Ease of Use

Satisfaction

Most voted positive review

5 People found this comment helpful

A bit complicated to set up everything and causes quite a bit of pain after the infusion, BUT it works very well and being able to space out administration of the drug every 4 weeks is great.

Shared reviews and ratings

Gb | 45-54 | Female | On medication for 1 to less than 2 years | Patient
5/27/2019
Condition: Primary Immune Deficiency Disorder
Overall rating 4.3
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

It was difficult to administer at first but after several months I feel comfortable with the administration of the medication. My life has improved since I began taking this medication.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Jazzy123 | 45-54 | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
4/11/2017
Condition: Primary Immune Deficiency Disorder
Overall rating 1.7
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

I wanted the convenience of having to infuse once a month, so I switched from Gammagard IVIG weekly. I went back to the tried and true Gammagard, the HyQvia was complicated to set up and use. After my doses I would feel tightness and a lot of muscle pain in the rib area. Did not like HyQvia at all.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Anonymous | 55-64 | On medication for 1 to less than 2 years | Patient
8/23/2016
Condition: Common Variable Agammaglobulinemia
Overall rating 4.7
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

Made a huge positive difference in my resistance to colds and other respiratory infections. Feeling less fatigued as well.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Anonymous | 35-44 | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
1/11/2016
Condition: Absence of Gamma Globulins in the Blood
Overall rating 4.7
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

A bit complicated to set up everything and causes quite a bit of pain after the infusion, BUT it works very well and being able to space out administration of the drug every 4 weeks is great.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Mimi | 55-64 | Female | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
11/16/2015
Condition: Common Variable Agammaglobulinemia
Overall rating 3.3
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

My dose of 37.5 g means 3 different sets of two vials, so setup and administration of the infusion is much more complicated than other sub-q products. Trainer from vials to bag, variable rate pump, push the RHH, and then infuse. More painful burning and headaches than hizentra, but only once every 3-4 WEEKS is great.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
ch207 | 65-74 | Female | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
11/3/2015
Condition: Absence of Gamma Globulins in the Blood
Overall rating 2.3
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

done at home by patient with help from others trained by health professional. complicated administration procedure. 400 ml takes 3.5 to 4.0 hours by infusion pump. results are not yet known. do not attempt without professional training always have extra infusion materials. after infusion there is moderate redness at the infusion site and some swelling of the stomach which subsides in one to two days.do only if necessary with physician recommendation when immnunoglobulins are deficient determined by testing Read More Read Less

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Anonymous | Female | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Caregiver
5/4/2015
Condition: Absence of Gamma Globulins in the Blood
Overall rating 2.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

Lots of pain with administration, rash, swelling. You won't see that in the video!

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More