Show ratings & reviews for

4.0 Overall Rating

Effectiveness

See less See more

Ease of Use

See less See more

Satisfaction

See less See more

Most voted positive review

18 People found this comment helpful

I love how all you medical people have each other's backs. You state that people "use the above ground parts for medicine." THE WHOLE PLANT is needed for treatment of cancer. Without the roots, it's ineffective.

Most voted negative review

9 People found this comment helpful

Sorry, this is not a review! However, as far as I know sorrel for medical use is rumex acetosella. Rumex acetosa is a cultivar used for food. I would like to know if both are acting in the same way. There is as well the French sorrel, a cultivar too and I forgot the Latin name. Why don't you include Latin botanical names in your headline?

Shared reviews and ratings

10/19/2020
Condition: Other
Overall rating 3.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

Sorry, this is not a review! However, as far as I know sorrel for medical use is rumex acetosella. Rumex acetosa is a cultivar used for food. I would like to know if both are acting in the same way. There is as well the French sorrel, a cultivar too and I forgot the Latin name. Why don't you include Latin botanical names in your headline?

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
NatureCuresEverything | Age: 45-54 |
4/28/2015
Condition: Cancer
Overall rating 5.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

I love how all you medical people have each other's backs. You state that people "use the above ground parts for medicine." THE WHOLE PLANT is needed for treatment of cancer. Without the roots, it's ineffective.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More