Show ratings & reviews for

5.0 Overall Rating

Effectiveness

Ease of Use

Satisfaction

Most voted positive review

1 People found this comment helpful

Easy to use, less expensive then epi-pen. In my experience (used Epi pen twice and Symjepi once) Symjepi DEFINITELY worked faster and with almost 0 side effects. My experience with Epipen was a mixed bag. First time, I was dizzy and nauseous for approx a week after. Second time, I had the shakes for approx 2 weeks after, and it just wiped me out. SYMJEPI, however, I felt 100% after using and highl...

Shared reviews and ratings

A. Cole | 55-64 | Male | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
1/17/2022
Condition: Life Threatening Allergic Reaction
Overall rating 5.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

In a nutshell: I paid WAY less, and have the comfort of feeling safe 24/7 . I only administered it 1 time, but unlike EpiPen, I had 0 residual effects. Thank you Symjepi!

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Paul T | 35-44 | Male | On medication for less than 1 month | Patient
12/5/2021
Condition: person at risk of anaphylaxis
Overall rating 5.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

Easy to use, less expensive then epi-pen. In my experience (used Epi pen twice and Symjepi once) Symjepi DEFINITELY worked faster and with almost 0 side effects. My experience with Epipen was a mixed bag. First time, I was dizzy and nauseous for approx a week after. Second time, I had the shakes for approx 2 weeks after, and it just wiped me out. SYMJEPI, however, I felt 100% after using and highly reccomend for anyone whos dealing with anaphylaxis.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More